Saturday, March 29, 2014

AKWESASNE'S TOXIC TURTLES


AKWESASNE'S TOXIC TURTLES

While looking through the websites for review I came across the title of Akwesasne’s Toxic Turtles.  This intrigued me, so I read further.

The Natives have always had a great respect for Mother Earth.  They were careful when hunting and farming to maintain a balance so as not to destroy the land or the creatures that inhabited it.  The Natives also held different religious views on how the world was formed.  The Mohawks, part of the Iroquois Nation, believed that the earth was formed on the back of a turtle.  They resided along the areas of what are now Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River.  The Mohawks resided in a land of thick forests, rich soiled lands, and home to many animals.  This land was named Akwesasne.  In Mohawk, Akwesasne means "land where the partridge drums".  (Grinde, Johansen).  In two generations, the land of natural wonders had become a place so poisoned that it was not safe to eat the fish or game.  “Today, environmental pathologists are finding turtles at Akwesasne that qualify as toxic waste” (Grinde, Johansen).

The area was also home to many factories.  General Motors, Reynolds Metals and Alcoa were three mentioned in this article.  These companies directly contributed to the degradation of the Akwesasne.  As Grinde and Johansen state “A once- pristine landscape of rivers and forests has been turned into a chemical dump where unsuspecting children played on piles of dirt laced with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) dumped by a nearby General Motors foundry.”  These factories had dumped by products of their manufacturing processes directly into the seaway, and also onto the land in unlined and uncapped pits, poisoning the land and animals.  The pollution had eventually spread to the Atlantic.

Little action was taken to try and rectify the pollution.  The companies and the DEC were not in agreement as to the source of the problem initially.  The factories tried to downplay the issue in order to save money, all the while continuing to dump toxins into the land and waterway.  The situation became worse as additional studies were performed, earning the nickname ‘contaminant cove’, and had become “one of the worst pollution sites in New York State and possibly one of the worst in North America” (Grinde, Johansen).  An example of this is the DEC testing of a female snapping turtle that had been caught.  Testing revealed the turtle contained 835 part per million of PCB’s.  To put this in perspective, the federal standard for edible poultry is 3 ppm, and fish 2 ppm.  Soil that contains 50 ppm is considered hazardous waste.  The female turtle contained approx. 15 times more than this.  A couple of years later, a male snapping turtle was caught and found to have 3,067 ppm, sixty times the minimum standard for hazardous waste (Grinde, Johansen).

For many years the Mohawks watched their land degrade in front of their eyes.  This only shifted into high gear when the St. Lawrence was realized as a source of cheap power, and more factories settled in.  Eventually the pollution had led to a warning to the Akwesasne  Mohawks not to eat the fish or vegetables from their gardens.  As Grinde and Johansen stated, “They cannot raise crops on it, hunt animals that fed on it, nor fish from water bordering it without poisoning themselves.”  In essence the Akwesasne  Mohawks way of life had been ruined. 

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Module 2 Blog; 19th Century Indian Relations with the United States.


Reviewing the on-line material, I noticed the title -- 19th Century Indian Relations with the United States.  There is a lot of information regarding policies that were enacted by the United States government to “act in good faith in its negotiations with sovereign Indian nations” (American Indian Issues). 

Three distinct policies were set up to deal with the Indians. 

  • The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 defined the manner in which the United States government would deal with the Indian nations. Section 14, Article 3 of the Ordinance proclaimed, "The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them."
  • The Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Section 8) declares that "The Congress shall have the power to regulate Commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." The Constitution thereby specified that there were three governmental entities within the United States with forms of sovereignty - Indian tribes, state governments, and the federal government.
  • The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790 placed nearly all interaction between Indians and non-Indians under federal - not state - control - including buying and selling of Indian land. It also established the new boundaries of Indian Country, protected Indian lands against non-Indian aggression, subjected trading with Indians to federal regulation, and stipulated that injuries against Indians by non-Indians was a federal crime. The conduct of Indians among themselves while in Indian country was left entirely to the tribes
    (American Indian Issues)

The intent to act in the best interest of the Tribes was there, however as the United States grew more land was needed for the white settlers, and these policies were overlooked.  Treaties -- legal agreements between the US government and the Indian nations -- were used to obtain the land from the Indians. In exchange the government “promised to provide protection, benefits, and rights to the American Indian peoples in exchange for some or all of their land. (American Indian Issues).”  Supreme Court decisions only complicated matters when they tried to interpret the treaties when disagreements occurred.  One Supreme Court ruling was that tribes have inherent sovereign rights, while the other stated that tribes only had the sovereign rights that congress gives them.  As the white population increased and demanded more room, the federal government stepped into and created four policies to obtain further Indian land: removal, reservations, allotment and assimilation, and elimination.

The creation of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 by then President Andrew Jackson gave the President the authority to remove the tribes from their lands, by force if necessary.

Reservations were created to confine the Natives geographical area.  The thought was that this would cause the Natives to assimilate and become civilized.

Allotment and Assimilation plans were to civilize the Natives by removing them from their communal land, thereby removing them from their culture.  It was believed that this along with reeducation would in turn lead to a civilized Native.

Any resistance by the Natives was thought to be an act of war, and thereby the use of military action against them was warranted, leading to resistors being eliminated.

After all these policies and attempts to civilize or outright eliminate the Natives, “the cultural and spiritual heritage of many Indian nations survived” and therefore helped to revitalize some Indian Nations.

 

 

 

Citations:

American Indian Issues: An Introductory and curricular guide for educators, 19th Century Indian relations with the United States, retrieved from http://americanindiantah.com/history/nar_19thcenturyrelations.html